The Legal Precedent
Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur (2017)
Before this judgment, many lawyers told NRI clients that skipping the
six-month period was simply not possible. That position has been legally
incorrect since 2017.
In this landmark ruling, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India
examined whether the waiting period under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage
Act was mandatory or discretionary. The court settled the question clearly.
The same principle has since been applied to cases under the Special Marriage
Act as well, making this ruling relevant to virtually all NRI mutual divorce
cases regardless of the applicable personal law.
Supreme Court of India, 2017
Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur
The Supreme Court held that the six-month cooling-off period under
Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act is directory in nature,
not mandatory. Family courts have the discretion to waive it where
the marriage has irretrievably broken down and all issues between
the parties have been settled.
Key Takeaway: If the marriage has truly broken down,
both parties have agreed on alimony, custody, and asset division,
and there is no realistic possibility of reconciliation, the court
has the legal authority to waive the wait entirely.